The Muzzle Wipe

| | Comments () | Digg This | Facebook

baboon.jpg

I was reading the book The First Word by Christine Keneally about the origins and evolution of human speech when I came upon this passage. Primate researcher Janette Wallis...

 

used hidden cameras to capture evidence of a baboon gesture she calls the muzzle wipe—a quick pass across the bridge of the nose with the hand. The muzzle wipe typically occurs in situations in which a baboon may be nervous or conflicted for some reason.

…Humans do put the hand to their face when nervous, and indeed, as she pointed out, psychiatrists and law enforcement officials often interpret a hand-to-face gesture as evidence of uncertainty or even deception.

Once Wallis convinced the audience that the muzzle wipe existed, she showed a video of George H.W. Bush. The ex-president was speaking at a press conference about his son the president of the United States. He discussed what was at the time headline news—George W. Bush’s having been arrested in his youth on a drunk-driving charge. “Unlike some,” said the older Bush in a tone of complete confidence, “he accepts responsibility.” He then raised his hand to the bridge of his nose and scratched it.

 

 

 

 

A lot of the details of my high school days are just a hazy blur, but one thing I can say with absolute certainty: when I graduated in 1967 the very concept of same sex marriage would have been met with total derision by virtually everyone in the country.

How the world can change in forty short years.

Back then, the word "homosexual" was never uttered on television, "gay" was still a synonym for "happy", and a guy could enjoy show tunes without having his guy-ness called into question.

Heck, back then most people could truthfully (if not strictly accurately) say that they didn't even know anyone who was gay.

(Just for some additional context, recall that Loving v. Virginia, which finally declared race-based restrictions on marriage were unconstitutional, was decided on June 12, 1967.)

I think the first time I encountered the word "gay" applied to homosexuals was in a controversial article in Life magazine from sometime in the mid-60's. The only thing I remember now from that article is its claim that gays liked to wear sneakers and sweaters, and the only reason I remember that is because it became a running gag among some of my crowd. Whenever we saw someone in sneakers we'd make a comment.

same sex marriage.jpg

But then in the late 60's and early 70's a gay activist movement began to gain some traction. Before long, gay characters began appearing occasionally in television shows, most notably on a famous episode of "All in the Family", where Archie Bunker learned that one of his drinking buddies was gay.

Somewhere around then, psychiatrists decided that homosexuality was not a disease after all, but a normal aspect of humanity's sexual behavior.

Oh, there were some kinks in the road as gays became more visible in society, such as when a third rate singer tried to revive her career by starting a campaign to "Save the Children" from the gay down in Florida.

But by the very early 80's it seemed that gay people were well on their way to achieving great gains in civil rights.

That's when AIDS entered our national consciousness. Since it was initially considered a gay disease ("gay plague" was one of its earliest nicknames), AIDS probably set back the gay rights movement by at least ten years.

But a funny thing happened. As more and more gay people "came out", many folks discovered that not only did they in fact know someone who was gay, but gays weren't as threatening as they had once thought.

Probably the single largest factor determining whether someone is for or against gay rights is whether they know someone who is gay or if there is a gay person in their family. (For example, take the Cheney family. Please.)

The second largest factor is age; the younger one is, the more likely one is to support gay rights.

Anyway, some time in the mid-90's the idea of same sex marriage began to make its way slowly into the public discourse.

And now the idea doesn't seem very strange to large segments of the population. Overall, the country seems to be about equally divided on the issue, and there are even a handful of states where it has a slim majority in favor of it.

In 1966 Kander and Ebb's musical "Cabaret" opened on Broadway. Set in Germany during the period that the Nazis were coming into power, one of its songs was performed by a German woman and her Jewish fiancé:

How the world can change
It can change like that
Due to one little word
"Married".

How the world can change. Indeed.

FBI Seal of Disapproval

| | Comments () | Digg This | Facebook

FBI-seal.jpg

So the FBI sez that Wikipedia can't display the FBI seal.

Do they mean this seal?

Anniversary Videos

| | Comments () | Digg This | Facebook

In 1993 as our parents' 50th wedding anniversary approached, my sister Donna and I decided to throw them a surprise celebration.

Working long distance, I in Philadelphia and she in Dover, PA, we made arrangements for a hall in Wernersville, PA. Well, actually Jane and Allen (our aunt and uncle) found the hall and were helpful in so many ways.

Although we planned for months and had a guest list of over 40, somehow our parents never caught on. They were really surprised, as you can see in the video.

In fact, for years afterward they kept marveling at how we kept it from them.

Reed and Lou recorded a lot of the event on their camcorders, and in 2003 I took their raw videos and edited them into a 15 minute presentation. Which is embedded here.

The video is in two parts, to meet Youtube's 10 minute limit.

 

 

In 2003 our parents insisted they didn't want another party, so we took them to New York, New York to see The Producers and the Bernadette Peters version of Gypsy. By then I had my own digital camcorder, but I wasn't very adept at using it. Consequently, although I shot more than Reed and Lou did, I had much less usable footage.

So the resulting video is much shorter.

BTW, one of the fun things about watching these videos together is seeing how much their grandson (and my nephew) Kevin grew in the intervening years.

Assassins

| | Comments () | Digg This | Facebook

This is me experimenting with embedding Youtube playlists.

So why not embed an entire Sondheim musical while I'm at it?

Here's a student production from ASU.

Jack and Locke.png

I usually get these wrong, but here goes.

I used to think that the Flash Sideways were the destination point for the series. That in the original timeline Desmond would do something that would shift the space/time continuum to create the timeline where the crash didn't happen, i.e. the Flash Sideways timeline.

But that would destroy all the character development of the past six years, making it meaningless.

Now what I think is that the Flash Sideways are the original timeline and that Sideways Desmond is going to work his magic mojo to rearrange the space/time continuum to bring about the timeline that we all know and love--the one where the crash happened.

So in other words in the crash timeline, what happened happened. Those who have died, really did die.

Simon_Singh.jpg

Great news!

The quacks, aka chiropractors, have dropped their lawsuit against Simon Singh!

The British Chiropractic Association has dropped its libel action against the science writer Simon Singh.

[...]

Dr Singh recently won an appeal that would have allowed him to use the fair comment defence in the case.

On Thursday, the website of William McCormick QC, one of the barristers acting for Simon Singh, said the British Chiropractic Association has served a "Notice of Discontinuance". This means the case is now over.

Question for Obama

| | Comments () | Digg This | Facebook

Obama Lauer.jpg

NBC is inviting viewers to submit questions for Matt Lauer to ask President Obama.

The interview will be airing on the Today show next Tuesday, I believe.

Here is the question that I submitted:

When discussing Indonesian human rights abuses, President Obama said, "We have to acknowledge that those past human rights abuses existed. We can't go forward without looking backwards..."

But last year when asked about investigating abuses by the United States, Obama said, "I'm a strong believer that it's important to look forward and not backwards, and to remind ourselves that we do have very real security threats out there."

Why is it important for Indonesia to acknowledge past abuses but not the United States?

The evidence mounts that Wolf Blitzer really is a pedophile.

Evidence

| | Comments () | Digg This | Facebook

Here is the evidence that proves Wolf Blitzer is a pedophile.